EVGA nForce 750i SLI FTW

July 22, 2008 | 08:28

Tags: #benchmark #cake #cheesecake #nforce #performance #results #sli #testing

Companies: #evga #intel #nvidia

Lavalys Everest Memory Performance

Website: Lavalys

Everest Memory Performance Test

  • Gigabyte GA-X48T-DQ6
  • XFX nForce 780i SLI
  • Asus P5Q Deluxe
  • Gigabyte GA-EP35-DS4
  • Gigabyte GA-EP45-DQ6
  • EVGA nForce 750i SLI
  • MSI P45 Platinum
  • MSI P35 Diamond
  • Abit IX38 QuadGT
    • 8698
    • 7072
    • 7383
    • 7904
    • 7074
    • 6458
    • 7621
    • 7083
    • 7271
    • 7510
    • 7080
    • 6922
    • 7201
    • 7068
    • 7116
    • 7102
    • 7065
    • 6141
    • 6949
    • 7076
    • 6979
    • 6734
    • 7089
    • 6158
    • 6524
    • 7061
    • 7141
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
9000
MB/s (higher is better)
  • Read
  • Write
  • Copy

Everest Memory Latency Test

  • XFX nForce 780i SLI
  • Gigabyte GA-X48T-DQ6
  • Asus P5Q Deluxe
  • Gigabyte GA-EP35-DS4
  • MSI P35 Diamond
  • Gigabyte GA-EP45-DQ6
  • Abit IX38 QuadGT
  • MSI P45 Platinum
  • EVGA nForce 750i SLI
  • 58.0
  • 59.4
  • 66.0
  • 66.2
  • 67.3
  • 69.5
  • 72.0
  • 75.3
  • 83.1
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Nanoseconds (lower is better)

With the latest BIOS we managed to get the EVGA nForce 750i FTW down to 4-3-3-10-1T memory timings. 3-3-3-9T gave us sporadic blue screens with our 2GB kit of OCZ FlexXLC PC2-9200 which uses the popular Micron-D9 memory chips. Even though the 7-series of Nvidia nForce chipsets see the greatest benefits from 1T memory timing, which we were able to run, in Everest the nForce 750i SLI performs pretty mediocre at best. While the read and write performance are quite good, the copy performance is severely lacking. However, this looks to be a "feature" of the Nvidia chipsets though as the nForce 780i SLI mirrors this.

The latency also seems to have taken a massive hit, even though we're running pretty tight memory timings. In contrast the XFX nForce 780i SLI which is based around the Nvidia reference design has the lowest latency we've seen and a much better read performance, even though it was only set marginally faster at 3-3-3-9-1T with the exact same memory used.

SiSoftware Sandra Lite XII.2008.SP2c (14.24)

Website: Sisoftware

Sisoft Sandra Unbuffered Memory Test

  • Gigabyte GA-X48T-DQ6
  • Asus P5Q Deluxe
  • Gigabyte GA-EP45-DQ6
  • Abit IX38 QuadGT
  • Gigabyte GA-EP35-DS4
  • MSI P45 Platinum
  • MSI P35 Diamond
  • XFX nForce 780i SLI
  • EVGA nForce 750i SLI
  • 7525.3
  • 7159.0
  • 6941.7
  • 6770.3
  • 6692.0
  • 6650.0
  • 6053.2
  • 5901.8
  • 5537.5
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
MB/s (higher is better)

Sisoft Sandra Random Memory Latency Test

  • XFX nForce 780i SLI
  • Asus P5Q Deluxe
  • Gigabyte GA-X48T-DQ6
  • Gigabyte GA-EP35-DS4
  • Gigabyte GA-EP45-DQ6
  • MSI P35 Diamond
  • Abit IX38 QuadGT
  • EVGA nForce 750i SLI
  • MSI P45 Platinum
  • 70
  • 70
  • 78
  • 80
  • 83
  • 84
  • 87
  • 88
  • 89
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Nanoseconds (lower is better)

Sisoft Sandra echos the Everest results - the EVGA nForce 750i SLI FTW comes out the bottom of the table in raw memory performance and almost the highest in the latency stakes. However this is just a guideline - what about the real world?...
Discuss this in the forums
YouTube logo
MSI MPG Velox 100R Chassis Review

October 14 2021 | 15:04